UOBAM’s Sustainable Investment and Active Ownership Approach

UOBAM’s ESG scoring methodology involves the assessment of material ESG factors of companies, determined by UOBAM’s proprietary materiality map which was developed taking reference to the Sustainability Accounting and Standards Board (SASB). We also apply ESG pillar weights to companies across 11 sectors that are classified using the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).

ESG scores are formulated using research and data sources which include multiple industry-leading third-party data providers and the local expertise of our regional sustainability analysts. In order to make the scores comparable across sectors and countries, adjustments are also made through normalisation methodology.

We also rely on our ESG Controversy Alert System, which is an artificial intelligence machine learning model that combs through news reports daily and assigns controversy scores for human review.

Our final adjusted ESG scores will be mapped to the following letter ratings:

As of May 2025, based on UOBAM’s database coverage of over 9,100 companies, our ESG score distribution is as follows: A (23%), B (40%), C (28%), D (9%).

UOBAM recognises the double materiality of environmental and climate risks within the thermal coal industry. Hence, our Environmental Approach includes provisions to support companies committed to transition toward cleaner energy sources, recognising that Asia remains reliant on conventional sources of energy, including thermal coal, and the transition requires both time and resources.

• Exclusion of companies that derive ≥20% of their revenue from thermal coal mining and/or power generation.
• Energy Transition provision to allow up to 10% of total portfolio weight for companies that derive ≥20% of their revenue from thermal coal mining and/or power generation but have initiatives and policies to transition towards cleaner energy sources, to ensure that only high-quality names committed to energy transition are held within our portfolios.

UOBAM’s Environmental Approach is applied across all portfolios firmwide, except for portfolios managed by external fund managers, portfolios that are subject to specific instructions given by clients, or any portfolios that we do not have discretion over security selection.

UOBAM’s Controversial Weapons Approach addresses the adverse social impact associated with the production, manufacturing, sale/purchase, and brokerage of controversial weapons, in alignment with broader international standards and our commitment to social responsibility.

The Controversial Weapons Approach outlines how we manage investments in companies involved in the production, manufacturing, sale/purchase and brokerage of controversial weapons. The scope of controversial weapons takes reference from broader international standards, and covers areas such as biological and chemical weapons, incendiary weapons, and cluster munitions.

Ratings from an external data provider are utilised to indicate confirmed involvement in the production, manufacturing, sale/purchase, and brokerage of controversial weapons. Companies red-flagged under our Controversial Weapons Approach will not be invested in for as long as they remain flagged. We will monitor their status on a regular basis and will re-consider investing if their status changes.

UOBAM’s Controversial Weapon Approach is applied across all portfolios firmwide, except for portfolios managed by external fund managers, portfolios that are subject to specific instructions given by clients, or any portfolios that we do not have discretion over security selection.

UOBAM’s Active Ownership Approach serves to facilitate dialogue, engagement, and proxy voting. We leverage our regional footprint and the local expertise of our regional investment teams to execute meaningful dialogues and engagement which will drive strategic investment decisions for the sustainable investments we make.

These activities form a key component of our responsible investment approach and fulfils UOBAM’s fiduciary duty as an investment manager to act in the best long-term interests of our clients.

Company Engagement:
We leverage our regional footprint to identify a range of thematic and material ESG issues that can affect our investee companies in the long-term and engage them to ensure that they are well prepared to mitigate these issues.

By engaging with companies, we can also encourage improvement in their ESG disclosures, identify the need to advocate positive change, communicate our concerns, and improve their practices on ESG issues, where necessary.

We prioritise our engagements based on several factors, including the geography of companies, size of our holdings, severity of identified material ESG issue, potential to generate long-term value following a successful engagement, and specific client request(s). UOBAM engages with companies through a variety of channels, but we do not currently disclose the details of our conducted engagements.

As part of our escalation strategy, UOBAM may pursue various courses of action should a company constantly fall short of the expected targets, including voting at annual company meetings, reducing our investment holdings, or divestment.

Proxy Voting:
In Singapore, we work with the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) on proxy voting and consider internationally recognised sustainability-related standards in support of ESG resolutions. While we have authorised ISS to vote on our behalf, we retain full discretion over all voting decisions and reserve the right to exercise our votes contrary to the recommendations by ISS.

There may be situations where UOBAM may choose not to vote or abstain from voting:

• Where administrative or other procedures result in the costs of voting outweighing the benefits;
• The voting securities are part of a securities lending program and UOBAM is unable to vote securities that are out on loan;
• A meeting notice is delivered close to the meeting date and UOBAM has insufficient time to adequately assess the issues being tabled at the shareholders’ meeting and / or process the vote;
• UOBAM sells shares prior to a company's meeting date and decides not to vote those shares, on the basis that UOBAM shall not be restricted from trading in a security due to an upcoming shareholder meeting; and
• Voting securities have been blocked from trading in order to be tendered for voting purposes and UOBAM believes that preserving the ability to trade the security is in the best interest of the beneficiaries;
• In event of a situation where regulatory obligations and rulings of the SIC imposed on UOB Group that also apply to UOBAM, may prohibit UOBAM from voting on securities due to its deemed affiliation for a corporate action.